Reviewer Guidelines
Information for our valued reviewers who help maintain the scientific quality of TNJ.
Reviewer Responsibilities
- Accept only reviews you are qualified to complete within the requested timeframe.
- Evaluate the manuscript objectively on scientific merit, novelty and significance.
- Provide specific, constructive and professional comments that help authors improve their work.
- Respect the confidentiality of the manuscript and its authors at all times.
- Declare any conflict of interest and recuse yourself when appropriate.
The Review Process
1
Invitation
You receive an invitation with the manuscript title and abstract.
2
Acceptance
Accept or decline the invitation through the online system.
3
Full review
Read the full manuscript and complete the structured review form.
4
Submission
Submit your recommendation: accept, minor/major revision, or reject.
5
Decision
The editor combines all reviewer reports and makes the final decision.
Ethical Expectations
- Never use information from an unpublished manuscript for your own benefit.
- Do not contact the authors directly — all communication goes through the editorial office.
- Report suspected plagiarism, duplication or fabrication to the editor.
- Keep the identity of co-reviewers and the review outcome confidential.
Review Timeline
2 wks
Expected Report Time
3–5 weeks
Average Review
30 days after acceptance
Publication After Acceptance